Holy Listening

Swamp Mennonite Church’s statement on Holy Listening is not a new theological idea, although the name Holy Listening appears to be relatively recent. The statement gathers several convictions that have deep roots in Anabaptist and Mennonite history: yieldedness to God’s will, Scripture read under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, discernment in the gathered congregation, obedience in every area of life, and participation in God’s kingdom and mission.

The clearest formal theological predecessor is the 1995 Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective, especially Article 16 on decision-making in the church. The closest immediate institutional background appears in Lancaster Mennonite Conference materials from 2006 through 2012, which combine Scripture, Spirit, communal discernment, God’s reign, and the language of joining or partnering with what God is already doing.

The Current Swamp Statement

Holy Listening: In openness to the will of God we listen to Scripture, the Holy Spirit, and each other in every decision we make. We look for God’s kingdom in all areas of our lives and partner with God in what He is doing. — Swamp Mennonite Church Points of Agreement

The statement appears within Swamp’s Points of Agreement. The surrounding Covenant of Faith speaks of openness to the Spirit’s presence and filling, daily guidance, mutual submission around God’s Word and Spirit, and periodic testing and refocusing of the congregation’s agreements. The page directs readers to the 1995 Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective for fuller explanation and study. This explicit reference provides an important interpretive and historical trail.

Historical Development at a Glance

Period and development	Historical emphasis	Connection to Holy Listening
1520s First Anabaptists	Scripture, the Holy Spirit, and gathered believers are brought together in discerning God’s will.	Foundation for listening to Scripture, the Holy Spirit, and each other.
1527 Schleitheim	Swiss Brethren meet, deliberate, and express a common mind. Early congregational instructions encourage believers to read Scripture together.	An early concrete expression of communal listening and discernment.
Sixteenth century Gelassenheit	Anabaptists emphasize yieldedness and surrender to God’s will instead of autonomous judgment.	A strong background for openness to the will of God.
Sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Menno Simons and later Mennonites	Claims to spiritual leading are tested against Christ, Scripture, and the believing community.	The Spirit is not treated as an independent inner voice.
1632 Dordrecht Confession	The church is a visible covenant community shaped by Scripture, obedience, mutual admonition, and the Spirit.	Discernment remains corporate rather than merely individual.
Twentieth century Communal discernment	Mennonite theologians increasingly describe the inheritance as community discernment or a congregational hermeneutic.	Older practices become a consciously articulated method of interpretation and decision-making.
1995 Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective	Scripture, Spirit, church, discernment, consensus, discipleship, kingdom, and mission are formally integrated.	The clearest theological predecessor of the Swamp statement.
2006 to 2012 Lancaster Mennonite Conference	LMC speaks of Scripture discerned in community and guided by the Spirit, then of discerning where God is at work and joining that work.	The closest immediate context for Swamp’s wording.
Current Swamp Mennonite Church	The older theology is condensed under the memorable heading Holy Listening.	A contemporary local formulation of an older Anabaptist Mennonite pattern.

1 The Anabaptist Beginning

C Arnold Snyder’s From Anabaptist Seed, prepared for Mennonite World Conference, summarizes the early Anabaptist approach to discerning God’s will as a pattern in which Scripture is interpreted by believers through the Holy Spirit, discerned in community, and tested by Jesus Christ. This summary closely parallels Swamp’s combination of Scripture, Spirit, community, God’s will, and God’s kingdom.

The Schleitheim material of 1527 gives early documentary form to this pattern. The Brotherly Union arose from Anabaptists gathering and reaching agreement on disputed matters. Related congregational instructions called believers to meet often, read Scripture together, receive explanation from the one given understanding, and listen as a community. The first generation therefore already displays Scripture, Spirit, and brothers and sisters together, even though it did not call the practice Holy Listening.

2 Openness to the Will of God

The opening phrase of Swamp’s statement has a distinctively Anabaptist resonance. One important historical term is Gelassenheit, commonly translated as yieldedness, surrender, letting go, or submission. The commentary to the 1995 Mennonite confession connects this heritage with radical openness to knowing and doing God’s will. Snyder describes early Anabaptist Gelassenheit as yielded acceptance of what God wills.

This background distinguishes Mennonite discernment from a process in which individuals merely state preferences and negotiate a compromise. Its deeper spiritual premise is that each participant first yields personal will so that the congregation may seek and obey God’s will together. Swamp’s phrase in openness to the will of God preserves this older spiritual posture.

3 The Spirit Is Tested by Scripture and Christ

The early Anabaptists encountered the enduring problem of people claiming spiritual inspiration for doubtful actions. Menno Simons therefore insisted that claims of spiritual leading must be measured against Jesus Christ and the scriptural witness to him. This protects communal discernment from becoming the simple addition of private impressions.

Article 3 of the 1995 confession follows the same pattern. It teaches that the Spirit leads the church into truth, while claims of contemporary revelation must not contradict the way of Christ revealed in Scripture. Such claims are tested within the community of faith. Historically, then, Scripture, the Spirit, and the voices of other believers are not three independent and equal authorities. The Holy Spirit guides the church as the community listens to Scripture centered in Christ and tests its understanding together.

4 The Corporate Church

The 1632 Dordrecht Confession does not use language resembling Holy Listening, but it preserves the corporate framework in which such discernment operates. It describes believers as joined in the communion of saints, living according to Christ’s teaching, and practicing mutual admonition and correction. Mennonite Christianity therefore did not place final emphasis on the isolated person deciding privately what God had said. Individual conviction mattered within a covenant community.

The 1963 Mennonite Confession of Faith continued to bind the church to Scripture, confess the lordship of Jesus, and emphasize the unity of the brotherhood. It also stressed that Christian obedience extends into every area of life, anticipating Swamp’s statement about looking for God’s kingdom in all areas of life.

5 A Historical Qualification

Modern Mennonites sometimes describe communal interpretation as though every sixteenth-century Anabaptist congregation practiced a fully developed consensus process identical to a contemporary congregational meeting. The surviving evidence is less uniform. John Howard Yoder’s 1967 description of an Anabaptist congregational hermeneutic fits the movement’s ecclesiology, but later historians have cautioned that early records provide less evidence of widespread systematic practice than some modern accounts imply.

The most accurate conclusion is that the roots are clearly sixteenth-century Anabaptist, while the highly articulated contemporary Mennonite theology and process of communal discernment developed gradually over time.

6 The 1995 Confession as the Clearest Formal Ancestor

Swamp Mennonite Church itself points readers to the 1995 Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective. Several articles explain the theological pattern that Swamp later condenses into Holy Listening.

Article 4 on Scripture teaches that Scripture is interpreted in harmony with Jesus Christ as the Holy Spirit leads the church. It also describes the church as discerning what God is saying in its own time and testing individual insights within the community of faith.
Article 3 on the Holy Spirit connects the Spirit’s guidance with unity in doctrine and action and with the church’s decision-making.
Article 16 on Church Order and Unity instructs church members to listen and speak with prayerful openness, keeping Scripture as their constant guide. It describes a patient process of discernment that seeks the Lord’s leading toward consensus and listens carefully to majority and minority voices.

The conceptual relationship is exceptionally close. The 1995 confession joins decisions, listening and speaking, prayerful openness, Scripture, the Spirit, discernment, and consensus. Swamp joins every decision, listening, openness to God’s will, Scripture, the Holy Spirit, and one another.

7 The Kingdom of God in All Areas of Life

The second sentence of Swamp’s statement also has clear roots in the 1995 confession. Article 10 says the church is called to proclaim and be a sign of God’s kingdom, patterning its life after God’s reign and continuing Jesus’ mission through the Holy Spirit. Article 24 calls the church to live now according to the future reign of God and embody its justice, righteousness, love, and peace. Article 17 connects doing God’s will, seeking God’s reign, and following Jesus in every area of life.

The wording about God’s kingdom in all areas of life therefore stands firmly within modern Mennonite expressions of the older Anabaptist conviction that discipleship encompasses the whole of life.

8 The Lancaster Mennonite Conference Connection

Swamp identifies Lancaster Mennonite Conference, now known as LMC, among its Mennonite affiliations. This connection is important because LMC materials provide wording that is especially close to Swamp’s first sentence.

During a 2006 conference discernment process, LMC named Christian community, mutual care, accountability, Christ-centered and Spirit-led discernment, and a reading of Scripture that leads to obedience. It described Scripture as understood through Christ, discerned in community, and guided by the Holy Spirit. Current LMC core beliefs retain substantially the same pattern. This is an immediate conference-level parallel to Swamp’s language about listening to Scripture, the Holy Spirit, and each other.

9 Partnering with God in What God Is Doing

Lancaster Conference’s 2020 Vision process, developed from 2010 through 2012, provides the strongest public clue to the second half of Swamp’s statement. LMC described a process of discerning where God was already at work and how congregations might partner as a fellowship. Leaders asked where congregations were being appointed to join what God was already doing and called churches to seek God’s activity and participate with the Spirit in God’s work.

The resemblance to Swamp’s language is substantial: look for God’s kingdom, then partner with God in what God is doing. The available public evidence does not prove direct copying, but the Lancaster vision process is a probable immediate theological and linguistic background. Later LMC assessment materials similarly describe prayer, Scripture, reflection, and discernment as holy conversations in which a congregation listens to God and responds in obedience. That vocabulary is only a short step from the label Holy Listening.

10 The Name Holy Listening

The name must be distinguished from the belief. Holy Listening does not appear to have been a standard technical term in early Mennonite history. It is unlike established terms such as Gelassenheit, discipleship, brotherhood, mutual counsel, or congregational discernment.

The phrase existed in wider Christianity by at least 1992, when Episcopal priest and spiritual director Margaret Guenther published Holy Listening The Art of Spiritual Direction. Her use concerned spiritual direction rather than Mennonite congregational decision-making, and no public evidence directly connects her book with Swamp’s wording.

The careful historical statement is therefore this: Holy Listening is a contemporary name Swamp uses for a constellation of practices and convictions with deep Anabaptist and Mennonite roots.

A Likely Genealogy

Early Anabaptism in the 1520s: Scripture read together, the Holy Spirit, discipleship, and testing by Christ
Gelassenheit: yielded openness to God’s will
Mutual counsel, accountability, brotherhood, and communal obedience
Twentieth-century articulation of congregational discernment
1995 Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective: Scripture, Spirit, church, prayerful listening, consensus, kingdom, and mission
Lancaster Mennonite Conference core values by 2006: Scripture discerned in community and guided by the Spirit
Lancaster Conference 2020 Vision from 2010 to 2012: discern where God is working and join God’s mission
Swamp Mennonite Church Points of Agreement: Holy Listening

Final Assessment

The Swamp statement contains two historical layers. Its first sentence is a contemporary condensation of classical Anabaptist and Mennonite communal discernment. Its deepest roots lie in sixteenth-century Scripture Spirit community discernment and Gelassenheit. Its clearest formal statement is Article 16 of the 1995 confession, and its closest conference-level expression appears in Lancaster Mennonite Conference’s core values by 2006.

Its second sentence combines the historic Anabaptist emphasis on God’s reign and whole-life discipleship with the more recent missional vocabulary of discerning where God is already active and joining God’s work. Lancaster Mennonite Conference used closely related language in its 2010 to 2012 vision process.

The theological roots of Holy Listening can therefore be traced to approximately 1525 to 1527; its mature modern formulation belongs especially to the twentieth century and the 1995 confession; the closest LMC formulation dates to at least 2006; and the language of partnering with God in what God is already doing is strongly associated with LMC’s missional discernment between 2010 and 2012.

One question remains open. Public sources do not establish when Swamp Mennonite Church adopted its present Points of Agreement, who drafted them, or whether the wording was consciously drawn from LMC material. Older congregational constitutions, covenants, minutes, newsletters, or records surrounding the adoption of the Points of Agreement would be needed to complete that local history.

Sources

1. Swamp Mennonite Church Our Beliefs. Current Covenant of Faith and Points of Agreement

2. Swamp Mennonite Church Affiliations. Connection with LMC

3. C Arnold Snyder From Anabaptist Seed. Historical synthesis of early Anabaptist teaching

4. Schleitheim Confession Source. Early Anabaptist communal agreements and church order

5. Vision A Journal for Church and Theology Issue 5 2. Discussion of Gelassenheit

6. Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective Spirituality. Commentary on openness to God’s will

7. Confession of Faith Article 3 Holy Spirit. Spirit guidance and testing in community

8. Confession of Faith Article 4 Scripture. Scripture interpreted through Christ in the Spirit-led church

9. Confession of Faith Article 16 Church Order and Unity. Prayerful listening, Scripture, discernment, and consensus

10. Confession of Faith Article 10 The Church in Mission. The church as a sign of God’s kingdom

11. Confession of Faith Article 24 The Reign of God. Present life under God’s future reign

12. Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective Full Text. Includes Article 17 on discipleship in every area of life

13. LMC Women in Leadership Recommendation 2006. LMC core values on Scripture, Spirit, and community discernment

14. LMC Mission Vision and Values. Current LMC core beliefs

15. LMC We See New Life. The 2020 Vision process and language of joining God’s work

16. LMC Getting Into the Balcony. Holy conversations and congregational listening

17. Dordrecht Confession of Faith 1632. Church as an accountable covenant community

18. Mennonite Confession of Faith 1963. Scripture, brotherhood, and obedience in every area of life

19. Goshen College Discussion of the Congregational Hermeneutic. Historical qualification concerning modern accounts of early Anabaptist practice

20. Margaret Guenther Holy Listening. A 1992 use of the phrase in Christian spiritual direction

Holy Listening

Share this:

Like this: